top of page
  • Writer's pictureShai Yallin

You Don't Need Kubernetes (Yet)

Man killing cockroach with a sledgehammer

In the world of modern software development, it's easy to get caught up in the hype surrounding tools and technologies like Kubernetes, microservices, cloud computing, and serverless architectures. These concepts have emerged from tech giants like Google and Amazon, who use them to solve their immense scaling challenges - scaling traffic, scaling storage, and scaling engineering teams.

But here's the thing: chances are, you're not Google or Amazon. Your startup or small business is likely facing a very different set of challenges. You might think that by adopting these tools early on, you're setting yourself up for success, ready to scale at a moment's notice. In reality, you might be weighing yourself down with unnecessary complexity.

The Pitfalls of Premature Optimization

Kubernetes, for example, is a powerful tool for orchestrating containerized applications, especially effective if you have a fleet of microservices you want to densely run on optimized hardware. But it comes with a steep learning curve and introduces significant operational overhead. If you're just starting out, the time and resources you spend on setting up and maintaining a Kubernetes cluster could be better spent on building and refining your core product.

The same goes for microservices. While breaking your application into small, independently deployable services can offer benefits in terms of scalability and flexibility, it also introduces complexity in terms of inter-service communication, data consistency, and testing. If your application doesn't yet have a clear need for the scalability that microservices provide, you might be adding complexity without reaping the benefits.

Start Simple, Evolve as Needed

So, what's the alternative? Start with the simplest technology stack that can get the job done, and evolve it as your needs change. For most web applications, this might mean starting with a monolithic architecture, a relational database, and deploying to a simple PaaS or even a single cloud VM. 

As your product and traffic grow, you get insight into where bottlenecks might lie, or what parts of the product need to have a separate deployment lifecycle, whereupon you can start to break them out into separate (micro)services. As clearer requirements for DB performance emerge, you can decide on more specialized database solutions. And as your system grows and becomes more complex to orchestrate - then, and only then, it might be time to consider a solution like Kubernetes.

The key is to let your architecture evolve in response to real, observed needs, not anticipated future needs. Premature optimization is the root of many a software headache.

Some questions to ask yourself before adopting a new technology:

  1. What specific problem am I trying to solve?

  2. Is this problem currently a bottleneck for my business?

  3. How much development effort will be required to adopt this technology?

  4. How much effort might be required to adopt this technology one year from now?

  5. Will this technology introduce complexity that will make my system harder to understand and maintain?

  6. Are there simpler alternatives that could suffice for now?

Remember, the goal is not to have the most technologically impressive stack, but to build a product that delivers value to your users. Keep it simple, keep it focused, and let your architecture evolve as your needs do. You'll avoid a lot of headaches, and you'll be able to put more of your energy into what really matters: building a great product.

71 views1 comment



Feeling stuck? dealing with growing pains? I can help.  

I'll reach out as soon as I can

bottom of page